Midterm summation : 53 Since then, the book's readings have totaled 38 pts, and with 6 class (out of 8) attendances it adds an addition 6 pts, which together gives 44. 44 + 53 = 97 pts In the grand total, I have attended all classes, except the last 2 since I had completed enough readings for the A and decided to spend the last two weeks really focused on my final assignments. Note: the 38 pts of the readings is assuming Bloodchild gives 5 pts. We haven't discussed what it's worth, but regardless, as long as it gives 1 point, I'll at least have 94 pts total (assuming I get all the points listed) which is enough for the A. This class, despite being a lot of reading, was really fun and relaxing, it's a good change compared to most liberal arts, I really loved it! Thank you David!
For me, the narration of this book is what really piqued my interest. In fact, the interviewer, or rather, “the boy” only exists in the context of having Louis talk to someone in order to pass the tale of his long eternal life. As the book progresses you get a sense that the boy has actually quite a different purpose. In fact, this becomes a way for Louis to make a point against eternal life. In fact, throughout his life, all he has felt is confusion, dissatisfaction and hatred. At first he struggled feeding, focusing on only rats, but he ultimately realizes that he needs to do like Lestat and feast on humans. However, he always despises the way of vampires, and is disgusted at the way Lestat never held back when feasting on the slaves of the plantation. What’s interesting is the fact that, while he struggled accepting his vampire self, others seemed to have no issue with it. For example, the French vampires of the theater, Lestat, and even Claudia all seemed to be okay with the l...
Babel 17’s premise is actually extremely interesting to me, as two years ago, I was actually listening to a Philosophize This podcast which was actually talking about the philosophy branch which discusses linguistics and the bias of languages and expression. My memory is a bit fuzzy on the subject, however what stuck with me is the fact that the limitations of vocabulary influences the extent to which you can communicate ideas or feelings. You are simplifying human emotion and thoughts and trying to put them into words. Or put differently, you are altering definitions in order to fit them within the vocabulary of your given language. If you speak multiple languages, you can actually encounter this phenomenon quite often when you try to explain something to someone and realize the perfect word you would prefer using does not exist in this given language. Another concept this raises is human experience. We often “box-in” or categorize through words, different aspects ...
Comments
Post a Comment