1. What is your reaction to the text you just read?: Well that's a very good question indeed. I guess I'm partly confused, partly curious. The thing with short stories are that they need to build the world in the shortest amount of time possible. You are thrown into the world and expected to understand it right away. In that sense, you concentrate on every chosen word and try to create an image in your mind of what the character is seeing and feeling. Since the story was so short, I'm not entirely sure I understood everything about the world, and I'm not entirely sure what it's trying to say. A lot of it seemed to discuss the effect of upbringing and how it affects one's view of the world, as the main character struggles with two perspectives concerning her world. Should she resent those egg creatures due to the cruel reproduction cycle they put Terrans through, or be thankful for their magical eggs, calming venom and mother-like nature? 2. What connections d...
Babel 17’s premise is actually extremely interesting to me, as two years ago, I was actually listening to a Philosophize This podcast which was actually talking about the philosophy branch which discusses linguistics and the bias of languages and expression. My memory is a bit fuzzy on the subject, however what stuck with me is the fact that the limitations of vocabulary influences the extent to which you can communicate ideas or feelings. You are simplifying human emotion and thoughts and trying to put them into words. Or put differently, you are altering definitions in order to fit them within the vocabulary of your given language. If you speak multiple languages, you can actually encounter this phenomenon quite often when you try to explain something to someone and realize the perfect word you would prefer using does not exist in this given language. Another concept this raises is human experience. We often “box-in” or categorize through words, different aspects ...
My experience with his book was pretty strange. Similar to last week, I found this book to be more interesting in its world building than its actual plot. In fact, I found the ending to be a little underwhelming, as it pretty much ended with their problem being solved, thus saving anyone, and the character being left, well happy, without that much development. On the other hand, what I did find interesting about the nature of the conflict is the notion that you aren’t safe anywhere. In fact, nowadays, when we play video games or enter new worlds through entertainment, we just try to escape our world and have that notion that we’re safe. In this world however, you can be hurt wherever you go, even in the metaverse, which actually reminds me of Sword Art Online . What’s more, I liked that the worldbuilding illustrated current world issues, such as wealth disparity, showing that, even in this futuristic world, not everyone would have access to technology and thus ...
Comments
Post a Comment