My experience with his book was pretty strange. Similar to last week, I found this book to be more interesting in its world building than its actual plot. In fact, I found the ending to be a little underwhelming, as it pretty much ended with their problem being solved, thus saving anyone, and the character being left, well happy, without that much development. On the other hand, what I did find interesting about the nature of the conflict is the notion that you aren’t safe anywhere. In fact, nowadays, when we play video games or enter new worlds through entertainment, we just try to escape our world and have that notion that we’re safe. In this world however, you can be hurt wherever you go, even in the metaverse, which actually reminds me of Sword Art Online . What’s more, I liked that the worldbuilding illustrated current world issues, such as wealth disparity, showing that, even in this futuristic world, not everyone would have access to technology and thus ...
Midterm summation : 53 Since then, the book's readings have totaled 38 pts, and with 6 class (out of 8) attendances it adds an addition 6 pts, which together gives 44. 44 + 53 = 97 pts In the grand total, I have attended all classes, except the last 2 since I had completed enough readings for the A and decided to spend the last two weeks really focused on my final assignments. Note: the 38 pts of the readings is assuming Bloodchild gives 5 pts. We haven't discussed what it's worth, but regardless, as long as it gives 1 point, I'll at least have 94 pts total (assuming I get all the points listed) which is enough for the A. This class, despite being a lot of reading, was really fun and relaxing, it's a good change compared to most liberal arts, I really loved it! Thank you David!
Babel 17’s premise is actually extremely interesting to me, as two years ago, I was actually listening to a Philosophize This podcast which was actually talking about the philosophy branch which discusses linguistics and the bias of languages and expression. My memory is a bit fuzzy on the subject, however what stuck with me is the fact that the limitations of vocabulary influences the extent to which you can communicate ideas or feelings. You are simplifying human emotion and thoughts and trying to put them into words. Or put differently, you are altering definitions in order to fit them within the vocabulary of your given language. If you speak multiple languages, you can actually encounter this phenomenon quite often when you try to explain something to someone and realize the perfect word you would prefer using does not exist in this given language. Another concept this raises is human experience. We often “box-in” or categorize through words, different aspects ...
Comments
Post a Comment